<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: High school drop-outs in college</title>
	<atom:link href="http://joannejacobs.com/2006/05/31/high-school-drop-outs-in-college/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://joannejacobs.com/2006/05/31/high-school-drop-outs-in-college/</link>
	<description>Free-linking and thinking on education by Joanne Jacobs</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 15:53:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Prof210</title>
		<link>http://joannejacobs.com/2006/05/31/high-school-drop-outs-in-college/#comment-32392</link>
		<dc:creator>Prof210</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2006 10:53:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joannejacobsblog.com/2006/05/31/high-school-drop-outs-in-college/#comment-32392</guid>
		<description>Here's a link:

http://www.lao.ca.gov/analysis_2006/education/ed_22_anl06.html

Please note especially Figure 2.  It appears that the cost of community college (not just student tuition) is significantly lower than the cost of high school on an annual basis per student.  

Thus, it seems to make more sense for the state to pay to subsidize community college, including remedial work, than to keep the students in high school.  
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a link:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.lao.ca.gov/analysis_2006/education/ed_22_anl06.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.lao.ca.gov/analysis_2006/education/ed_22_anl06.html</a></p>
<p>Please note especially Figure 2.  It appears that the cost of community college (not just student tuition) is significantly lower than the cost of high school on an annual basis per student.  </p>
<p>Thus, it seems to make more sense for the state to pay to subsidize community college, including remedial work, than to keep the students in high school.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Walter E. Wallis</title>
		<link>http://joannejacobs.com/2006/05/31/high-school-drop-outs-in-college/#comment-32391</link>
		<dc:creator>Walter E. Wallis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2006 01:08:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joannejacobsblog.com/2006/05/31/high-school-drop-outs-in-college/#comment-32391</guid>
		<description>All public education above High School should be paid for with a surcharge on future income tax or with civic or military service.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All public education above High School should be paid for with a surcharge on future income tax or with civic or military service.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wayne Martin</title>
		<link>http://joannejacobs.com/2006/05/31/high-school-drop-outs-in-college/#comment-32390</link>
		<dc:creator>Wayne Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2006 23:25:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joannejacobsblog.com/2006/05/31/high-school-drop-outs-in-college/#comment-32390</guid>
		<description>&#62; California community colleges will take 
&#62; anybody with a pulse ..

That might not be a problem, on the face of it.  However, the taxpayers are subsidizing the cost of education for these students.  A few years ago the legislature raised the cost of tuition to be fairly close to the cost of providing educational services in the CCs.  The Deans of the "institutions" went catatonic and effectively lobbied the legislature to restore the rather healthy subsidies.  They argued: "if the students have to pay what it costs to educate them, they won't pay and the CCs will begin to lose students."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; California community colleges will take<br />
&gt; anybody with a pulse ..</p>
<p>That might not be a problem, on the face of it.  However, the taxpayers are subsidizing the cost of education for these students.  A few years ago the legislature raised the cost of tuition to be fairly close to the cost of providing educational services in the CCs.  The Deans of the &#8220;institutions&#8221; went catatonic and effectively lobbied the legislature to restore the rather healthy subsidies.  They argued: &#8220;if the students have to pay what it costs to educate them, they won&#8217;t pay and the CCs will begin to lose students.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
