top of page
Writer's pictureJoanne Jacobs

Black history in Florida: 'Strong, valuable people'

Alex Haley's Roots, which traced his ancestors back to Africa, was a very big deal when it was shown on TV in 1977. I was surprised to see that Haley's great-grandfather was a blacksmith, both as a slave and as a free man. I'd thought of slaves as unskilled laborers picking cotton, but many were skilled artisans, wrote John Michael Vlach, a George Washington University professor.


Georg Stanford Brown played Alex Haley's great-grandfather, Tom Harvey, a blacksmith, in "Roots."

Enslaved "blacksmiths, carpenters, coopers, shoemakers, tanners, spinners, weavers and other artisans . . . developed not only a spirit of self-reliance but experienced a measure of autonomy," he wrote. "These skills, when added to other talents for cooking, quilting, weaving, medicine, music, song, dance, and storytelling, instilled in slaves the sense that, as a group, they were not only competent but gifted. Slaves used their talents to deflect some of the daily assaults of bondage. They saw themselves then as strong, valuable people who were unjustly held against their will rather than as the perpetually dependent children or immoral scoundrels described by so many of their owners."


Vice President Kamala Harris flew to Florida to charge that the state's new guidelines for teaching history, including black history, would "replace history with lies."

Speaking in Jacksonville, Harris said the curriculum teaches that "enslaved people benefited from slavery.


One line calls for teaching "how slaves developed skills which, in some instances, could be applied for their personal benefit."


Florida will teach about the evils of slavery, resistance to slavery, the Underground Railroad, Reconstruction, the Great Migration, the Harlem Renaissance, the civil rights movement and the many achievements of African Americans, writes Charles C. W. Cooke in the National Review. He read the full curriculum, which is available here, and noted every reference to black history. Click the link to see for yourself.


Instruction will include writings by Sojourner Truth, Frederick Douglass, William Wells Brown, David Walker, Martin Delaney, and discussions of "Prince Hall, Phillis Wheatley, Benjamin Banneker, Richard Allen, the Free African Society, Olaudah Equiano, Omar ibn Said, Cudjoe Lewis, Anna Jai Kingsley."


Students are supposed to learn about "the struggles faced by African American women in the 19th century as it relates to issues of suffrage, business and access to education."


Teachers will cover campaigns for community self-sufficiency and "the contributions of black innovators, entrepreneurs and organizations to the development and growth of black businesses and innovations."


Among the many African-American role models listed, by the way, is Kamala Harris.


Whether teachers teach and students will learn everything in this incredibly ambitious curriculum is an open question. (OK, it's not. They won't.) But it's not a happy-clappy dismissal of slavery or of African-American history.


I think the underlying objection is that the curriculum emphasizes the strengths of enslaved and free African Americans, rather than casting them as helpless victims of eternal racism. It suggests there's been progress.


I belong to a Jewish book club. Periodically, someone (usually me) says: No more Holocaust books! And let's not read about the Spanish Inquisition or the Russian pogroms either. Enough already.


Do black parents want more emphasis on the horrors of slavery? Or more stress on black achievers?

Recent Posts

See All

18 Comments


Richard Rider
Richard Rider
Aug 05, 2023

Great quote, but a non sequitur.

Who is "we"? Assuming it's living whites, what is their sin -- beyond the color of their skin? Not to mention the "sin" of Asians, Hispanics, etc. -- all of whom are supposed to pay the reparations to blacks. The issue is this: "Do people TODAY somehow owe reparations to the DESCENDENTS of slaves?" The answer is NO for many reasons -- including the FACT that blacks today BENEFITED from the terrible enslavement of their great, great, great parents. Otherwise they'd be living today in Africa -- either by birth or by choice.

Like

Guest
Jul 25, 2023

What a Black parent wants depends on their own education and roots. In my area, one group wants the school system academic offerings to be a higher quality, specifically at least what the British and French offered in the 60s and open to all who will do the necessary studying. The other wants the school to prepare students for Union jobs...and that means improving the academics so all who are capable grad on grade level.

Like

lady_lessa
Jul 24, 2023

May I recommend the biography, "Master, Slave, Husband, Wife" by Ilyon Woo. It tells of a married couple who escaped slavery, before the Civil War, and became (for a time) abolitionist speakers, and other careers as well.


Sad thing is that more folks do NOT know the story of Ellen and William Craft.

Like
Guest
Jul 25, 2023
Replying to
Like

Guest
Jul 24, 2023

Compare the numbers of Africans involuntarily transported to Brazil to the number sent to North America; compare next the "natural increase" population growth -- births to families -- of both nations. It's a terribly awkward way to phrase it, but an individual African who might hypothetically been plucked off a ship bound for Brazil (or the Caribbean, or a dozen other destinations other than English-speaking North America) and re-consigned to a ship headed for Virginia should be considered to have "benefitted" from such a imaginary and magical change.

Like

phillipmarlowe
Jul 24, 2023

Reading the litany of abuses and discrimination against slaves and their descendants, it is easy to see what CRT and “wokeness” gets its fuel.

Like
Guest
Jul 25, 2023
Replying to

CRT actually comes out of the differences between whites and blacks in the legal system.

Like
bottom of page