Dump the devices and bring back textbooks
- Joanne Jacobs
- Mar 20
- 2 min read
Textbooks are boring, they said. Textbooks are stuffed with so many graphics and sidebars that they're overwhelming. Textbooks are obsolete.
Textbooks -- printed on paper -- are valuable learning tools, argues Robert C. Thornett, who teaches at a Great Hearts classical school in Arizona, in Education Next.

Schools brag that they're "ditching textbooks for digital learning," he writes. Often, that means materials found online or created by colleagues with no guarantee of accuracy or coherence.
By contrast, "everything found in a good textbook — narratives, diagrams, art, maps, primary documents, homework questions — is carefully planned and organized by experienced authors and professional editors," Thornett writes. Furthermore, "state-approved textbooks are tailored to cover the state learning standards." Without a textbook, it's harder to track students' progress through the curriculum.
Textbooks usually are written by a committee, critics complain. They are rarely literary masterpieces.
But the process has value, writes Thornett. "The content of textbooks is often a matter of fierce debate between parents, state and local school systems, and even politicians. . . . The PowerPoint presentation Bob made and dropped into the departmental folder is vetted by no one before teachers use it in their classes."
E-books "are usually cheaper and more portable," he writes. "They allow text searches and embedded links to source material." They can be updated easily.
But reading on screens has a “detrimental effect” on reading comprehension that “increases over time," according to a 2018 study. Students already spend way too much time looking at screens.
Sweden is dumping digital devices and going back to printed textbooks, reports Samir Sebti for Daily Galaxy. In 2009, Swedish schools went digital. It was modern and high tech, and they hoped it would be cheaper in the long run.
But, "reading on screens (especially those bright ones) can lead to more eye strain and less focus than good old paper," Sebti writes. It "can mess with memory retention and understanding text." And devices in the classroom are distracting.
So the Swedes are buying printed textbooks for every subject, and encouraging students to spend less time on screens.
The Swedes are right, argues Michael Zwaagstra for Canada's Frasier Institute. Students need more printed textbooks and fewer devices in the classroom.
"The latest Programme for International Assessment (PISA) report, which tests the academic skills of 15-year-old students around the world, found a negative correlation between excessive student use of digital devices and academic achievement in math, reading and science," he writes.
I would suggest bringing back the older text books, with fewer side bars and more rigor. This was years ago, so I have no idea about the current status. I had a college level analytical chemistry text book that I studied on my own, because I knew it was my weakest area. (I missed needing remedial analytical chemistry by 1 point in grad school.) Years later I was using it because we were having some interesting issues at work. I had copied the section which talked about the basis for the challenge we were having.) My boss borrowed and never returned the book so I replaced it with a newer version of the same text. I was horrified…
Which textbook matters too. Above are 3, all for algebra: From 2007, weighing in at 5 pounds From 1990, weighing in at 3 pounds, and about an inch smaller in each direction. From 1898, weighing in at 1 pound, and several inches smaller in each direction from the 2007 version. As far as I know, algebra hasn't changed in the last 125 years, but books have gotten bigger, glossier, more bloated, with extraneous material (like human interest and bows to inclusion), more distracting, and much, much heavier. And, the weight adds up. Back in 1898, four textbooks would weigh in at about 4 pounds. Today that's 20! No wonder kids have taken to having rolling backpacks!
Bring back Math textbooks only if they are (a) good and (b) cheap. Dover is the model. Students have to be able to take them to the beach and not worry about a squall while they're out swimming. That rules out $75 coffee table books (i.e., books so large you could glue legs to them and use them as coffee tables).
Also, shun anything topical. That's planned obsolescence.
This is a step back in the right direction. Nonetheless, better textbooks serve beyond state lines, and even beyond international borders, as the Oxford University Press texts I have been using to prepare for Cambridge Assessment linked to the Common Core standards in English, as well as books from Singapore and Shanghai that are linked to a Japanese course of study to achieve China's mathematical curriculum standards for compulsory education, make clear.