To kill a vampire permanently dead, you'll need to hammer a wooden stake in its heart, shoot it with a silver bullet melted down from a crucifix or cut off its head, ideally with a silver knife or axe, then burn the body. Go heavy on the garlic and the holy water.
Killing bad teaching practices is even harder, writes Robert Pondiscio in Getting Reading Right in Commentary. They just don't stay dead.
In the 1990s, "balanced literacy" emerged as a compromise between teaching phonics explicitly and immersing students in"whole language" with little help in decoding. Lucy Calkins, a Columbia professor, promoted "Units of Study," which urged teachers to use teaching methods "for which research evidence is thin," writes Pondiscio.
For example, struggling readers were urged to look for clues, such as pictures or the first letter of the word or to guess at what word might make sense. They read -- or pretended to read -- books they chose themselves.
Decades of research shows that most children need to be taught phonics, systematically and explicitly, and discouraged from guessing at words. They also need to be taught background knowledge and vocabulary to understand what they decode.
The evidence for what's now called "the science of reading" is so strong that Columbia announced in September it "was cutting ties with Calkins and 'dissolving' her multimillion-dollar Teachers College Reading and Writing Project," writes Pondiscio. New York City schools, which were heavy users of her project, are switching to phonics-heavy reading programs and banning Units of Study.
Pondiscio started teaching fifth grade in a South Bronx school in 2002. His classroom was filled with struggling readers, all black and Hispanic children from low-income families. The school spent most of the day trying to teach reading, cutting time for science, social studies, art and music. Students didn't develop the background knowledge that might help build comprehension -- and few mastered reading.
But he wasn't supposed to teach, his Calkins-trained "literacy coach" told him. Explicit explanations and directions were "giving instructions," not teaching, she said.
He was supposed to "model" the habits of good readers, then send them off to read on their own. Students were called "readers" and "authors," as though "this could be a self-fulfilling prophecy," he recalls.
"Calkins’s greatest sin against literacy is what can only be described as the Tinkerbell Effect: the sense that children will become good readers if their teachers would only believe with sufficient fervor," Pondiscio writes. The secret, teachers were told, is to get kids "to love books and stories — not so much teaching reading as selling it to children."
But, if reading is a struggle, lovers of stories can watch videos.
Pondiscio worries that the monster isn't really dead. Some teachers will resist learning new ways to teach. Others will go too far, teaching all phonics all the time and forgetting about the need to develop students' knowledge and vocabulary.
"Phonics, while critical, is just the starting line," he concludes. "Reading comprehension is the long game."
One third of students at VOICE school in Queens are recent migrants living in shelters or hotel rooms, reports Marianna McMurdock on The 74. Most speak Spanish, but some come from Pakistan, Egypt and other countries. The K-8 school is scrambling to teach them before they're moved on. A reading chart on "tricky words" urges them to guess by looking at the picture and skip difficult words.
The move to explicit, systematic, research-based reading instruction will take time and require retraining teachers, writes Pamela Snow, a cognitive scientist in Australia. There's no excuse for continuing low-impact strategies, she argues, "It is the job of schools, not parents, to teach children how to read, and schools can do this successfully, even in disadvantaged communities, if they apply rigorous evidence in their approach to reading instruction."
Balanced literacy makes life easier for teachers, she concludes, but not for students.
If people *really* cared about so-called social justice, their primary focus would be teaching reading. On the other hand, people who can't read don't often learn much, and thus are great cannon fodder for demagogues (and worse), which perhaps explains why the teaching of reading is not treated as *the* civil rights issue of our time.
--mrmillermathteacher
The posters are for the untrained aides. The majority of students cannot read them.
The main reason my wife and I pulled out kids out of public elementary schools in the 1980's was the fact that the teachers were not using phonics. My wife is a highly qualified high school English teacher, and she could quickly see that the modern reading methods were not working. Switching our two boys to phonics resulted in a complete turnaround in their skills -- and not only in reading.
There's a related story about how bad teachers who are de facto "tenured" (2 years in CA) are almost impossible to fire. My wife has an amazing horror story about a coke addict who would abandon her classroom over and over. Just left school to get high (actually she often WAS high). In September she'd show up a week late with her labor union attorney, demanding her spot (she always got it). Her classroom instruction consisted of handing out worksheets and then simply sitting at her desk. The kids learned nothing (10th grade). My wife got those kids in her 11th grade English class, dragging down the learning progress for ALL her students. The administration was either unwilling or incapable of firi…